Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 12, 2008, 07:22 AM // 07:22   #1221
Ascalonian Squire
 
jeesuss89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: 117
Profession: Me/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

For god's sake people, this has nothing to do with real-life situations, WoW, hacks or whatever. You people are insulting every single one of the 117, dubbing them ALL hackers. Every single one of you who have NO IDEA what happened should stfu. You know nothing. NOTHING. Sure, one or two may have hacked, but for the other 115-116, put yourself in there shoes;

Someone PM's you. "Wanna do Mallyx???"

You: "Sure"

Someone: "Have you done the 4 areas before???"

You: "Yeah"

--- After Mallyx ---

You: "Thanks for the run"

Someone: "Wanna do it again???"

You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas"

Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down"

You: "Kk"

Do NOT BS and say you wouldn't consider it. Maybe not do it, but you would definately consider it. One/two people you can address as hacks, but for the rest who were given an opportunity to make maybe 20k every 30mins.

My only regret is being oblivious and naive.
jeesuss89 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 07:25 AM // 07:25   #1222
Forge Runner
 
You can't see me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Profession: P/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
For god's sake people, this has nothing to do with real-life situations, WoW, hacks or whatever. You people are insulting every single one of the 117, dubbing them ALL hackers. Every single one of you who have NO IDEA what happened should stfu. You know nothing. NOTHING. Sure, one or two may have hacked, but for the other 115-116, put yourself in there shoes;

Someone PM's you. "Wanna do Mallyx???"

You: "Sure"

Someone: "Have you done the 4 areas before???"

You: "Yeah"

--- After Mallyx ---

You: "Thanks for the run"

Someone: "Wanna do it again???"

You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas"

Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down"

You: "Kk"

Do NOT BS and say you wouldn't consider it. Maybe not do it, but you would definately consider it. One/two people you can address as hacks, but for the rest who were given an opportunity to make maybe 20k every 30mins.

My only regret is being oblivious and naive.
I and others don't need to "BS" to say that we would not consider it, as we posess the common sense not to abuse game bugs. People who do not realize that this is against the rules and respect it as much as any other rule deserve any punishment Arenanet gave to them.

You cannot accuse people they would steal a quarter if it was lying on the ground but belonged to someone else. Your thesis is ignorant and makes no point in attempt to stereotype all people who may have been exposed but were not as people who would have considered exploiting the bug.

I'm going to bed. It's too late to deal with people's lack of common sense.

Last edited by You can't see me; Jan 12, 2008 at 07:28 AM // 07:28..
You can't see me is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 07:28 AM // 07:28   #1223
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: Me/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
I cannot stress enough how ludicrous it is to think that all the infamous 117 are greedy, evil, unforgivable hackers whose sole purpose was to exploit a programming error until all their selfish needs were satisfied while all other members of the Guild Wars gaming community were abandoned in the depths of an economic crash. Does that description sound over exaggerated and harsh? Well, anyone who knows the truth will be forced to agree on the fact that it is an inaccurate perception of the real situation, a situation that only Arena Net and the 117 know the truth behind. I ask you, why are the 117 being accused of such atrocities when there was never any hard, solid proof presented to the public that they were really guilty of the crimes they supposedly committed?
Yes, it is possible that some of the 117 that were banned were in fact, innocent. However, it is obvious from previous exploits that there are those who will use an exploit for their own personal gain, whether or not it has any effect(s) on the game. Now, if a person were to find an exploit that could produce great returns, I would bet my bottom dollar that they would use it for their own selfish gains. So does your description of the 117 sound ludicrous? No; not at all.

Now why would any and/or all the evidence pertaining to this issue need to be presented to the public? All it would accomplish would bring closure to the skeptics who believe A-Net is incompetent, deceiving, or both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
A veil of imprecision shrouds the definitions of “exploiting” and “cheating”, and now should we add “hacking”? I have had the honor of personally knowing a handful of the 117, and I will not be the first to admit that they are not hackers. In fact, they are so far from hackers, one of them can’t even set up Outlook. Does that sound like a hacker to you? None of them know what .dat files are. Are they still hackers? It is despicable when someone is wrongfully accused of being something they are not, and then the majority of the community exiles the accused and kicks them when they are down and stone then until they bleed. When did we all become liable judges? What justification exists that gives us the right to insult and spell out the fate of the defendants?
Now we are just getting into symantics. The fact remains that an exploit was intentionally abused by a group of people to obtain certain rewards through an obviously easier method.

Was that wrong of them to do so? Yes.

Was it against the EULA? Yes.

Should they get banned? Yes.

Is there a need to add insult to injury for those who were banned? Nope, but that does not mean that it isn't their prerogative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
The definite lines between justice and discrimination are now blurred. Who is wrong? Who is right? The people that are not members of the two parties will never know the real truth, so let’s stop fooling each other. Arena Net is not telling the truth, and the 117 are not telling the truth… so where will this arguing get us?
A-Net is not telling the truth? Now what would A-Net gain from just making all this up? So they could ban 117 of their customers without any foreseeable benefit other than being malicious? Sorry, but this just seems like some crazed conspiracy theory you are concocting up.




To those who were indeed banned unjustly, I wish you the best of luck in rectifying this.
Horus Moonlight is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 07:31 AM // 07:31   #1224
Krytan Explorer
 
vaxmor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ascalon
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89

You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas"

Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down"

You: "Kk"
minor leap of imagination: The entire GW community would spl0it these h4x for all theyre worth.

Considering how much QQing is coming from 117 spl0iterz, I reckon ANet were far too LENIENT, I say: Permanent ban for anyone who was on any one of these 177s friend list, too~!
vaxmor is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 07:59 AM // 07:59   #1225
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
My point exactly. So please, I've had enough of people who weren't involved with this event. Either close the thread, or leave it to A-net and the 117.
Saying that everyone else should keep to themselves because "it's none of their business" is rather incorrect. It is an online game with an affected economy (just one of the factors, not the factor) as well as numerous other factors. I play it, so therefore it affects me.

Last edited by Bryant Again; Jan 12, 2008 at 08:06 AM // 08:06..
Bryant Again is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:04 AM // 08:04   #1226
Ascalonian Squire
 
jeesuss89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: 117
Profession: Me/
Default

Trust me. The economy was not affected enough to cause a ban of the proportion. Are you saying that bots don't affect the economy enough and A-net doesn't need to do as much about it as the 117??? Please...
jeesuss89 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:09 AM // 08:09   #1227
Desert Nomad
 
maraxusofk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, UC Berkeley
Guild: International District [id多], In Soviet Russia Altar Caps You [CCCP], LOL at [eF]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
Trust me. The economy was not affected enough to cause a ban of the proportion. Are you saying that bots don't affect the economy enough and A-net doesn't need to do as much about it as the 117??? Please...
yes b/c anet has NEVER banned any bots before right?

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s....php?t=3043462
maraxusofk is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:11 AM // 08:11   #1228
Ascalonian Squire
 
jeesuss89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: 117
Profession: Me/
Default

They do, but once these bots make enough profit from that one account by acquiring enough in-game gold, sites sell this in-game funds raised by the bots, a-net then bans the account knowingly that the site will buy more accounts, making a win-win situation for both.

However, this has nothing to do with 117, so please, I don't want to repeat...
jeesuss89 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:19 AM // 08:19   #1229
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
They do, but once these bots make enough profit from that one account by acquiring enough in-game gold, sites sell this in-game funds raised by the bots, a-net then bans the account knowingly that the site will buy more accounts, making a win-win situation for both.
It's more a lose-lose situation, actually: They can either let the bots go unbanned and acquire large sums of gold, or ban the account and suspend their actions momentarily.

Also, a large amount of bots come from stolen accounts. Whether it's "large amount" or "majority" I don't remember.
Bryant Again is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:21 AM // 08:21   #1230
Ascalonian Squire
 
jeesuss89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: 117
Profession: Me/
Default

That statement is contradictory.

You say its lose-lose??? How come these sites are still active???

And A-net still gets money for the accounts regardless where they're stolen from the original owner or not.
jeesuss89 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:23 AM // 08:23   #1231
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
You say its lose-lose??? How come these sites are still active???
Because they, the bots, are hard as hell to stop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
And A-net still gets money for the accounts regardless where they're stolen from the original owner or not.
ANet potentially loses a customer if an account is stolen. It really depends on the individual, really, but I for one would not want to have to spend another huge some of cash for all four titles.
Bryant Again is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 08:41 AM // 08:41   #1232
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

I was one of the unlucky ones i lost 2 accounts cos of this.
And btw the people who showed them this glitch also got banned.
wat galie gay said that no one got banned for visiting the area and that is lies cos i got banned for visiting it and so did alot of others.
danshep is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 09:13 AM // 09:13   #1233
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: N/
Default

I'm really annoyed at how people allways try to find the easy way out. Maybe you didn't all "hack" but you sure knew you were "cheating". You just hoped to get away with it. You might think you're not doing anything harmfull, but I allways find that how people act while playing a game they enjoy during their spare time is a pretty good show of their character.
odly is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 09:32 AM // 09:32   #1234
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Guild: The Azure Clan
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by odly
I'm really annoyed at how people allways try to find the easy way out. Maybe you didn't all "hack" but you sure knew you were "cheating". You just hoped to get away with it. You might think you're not doing anything harmfull, but I allways find that how people act while playing a game they enjoy during their spare time is a pretty good show of their character.
You will be surprised there are some that didnt know it was a bug, i was 1 of them.. believe it or not..its not like that area Says This is a bug area please leave -.-.. if it says that every1 will leave
The Great Ithqua is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 09:42 AM // 09:42   #1235
The Fallen One
 
Lord Sojar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oblivion
Guild: Irrelevant
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Great Ithqua
You will be surprised there are some that didnt know it was a bug, i was 1 of them.. believe it or not..its not like that area Says This is a bug area please leave -.-.. if it says that every1 will leave
Wow, because clearly you can zone to Mallyx's chamber normally by doing some uber quest right? Over a full year of NOT being able to go there, and all of the sudden with a traveling glitch, you suddenly believe that this occurrence wasn't a bug? Your either not the sharpest scalpel in the biology lab, or your trying to act innocent. I am going to go with the latter out of sheer respect for not trying to insult you.
Lord Sojar is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 10:08 AM // 10:08   #1236
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: SWAT
Profession: A/W
Default

I used the exploit and got banned, ya i suck. but the only problems i have are:

-No one got banned for the Guild Hall Travel Exploit, that allowed infinite number of chars to travel to anywhere in the game.

-No one got banned for the Slavers exploit, that killed the EOTN economy and completely dropped the prices of many "rare" skinned weapons, weeks after being introduced into the game

-When the big duping exploit happened not to long ago, hardly anyone besides the original ppl who discovered the duping method were banned, even though thousands profited off of it.

I dont care if they strip my account of everything, all my armor and weapons and money, i dont give a shit. i just want my monk back.

ive spent more late nights and been on more adventures with that lil guy.

and yes im f'ing crying about this, call me a QQer all u want.

im sry

i just want my Misera Cantra Mo/E back

Last edited by turin9; Jan 12, 2008 at 10:11 AM // 10:11..
turin9 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 10:16 AM // 10:16   #1237
The Fallen One
 
Lord Sojar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oblivion
Guild: Irrelevant
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turin9
I used the exploit and got banned, ya i suck. but the only problems i have are:

-No one got banned for the Guild Hall Travel Exploit, that allowed infinite number of chars to travel to anywhere in the game.

-No one got banned for the Slavers exploit, that killed the EOTN economy and completely dropped the prices of many "rare" skinned weapons, weeks after being introduced into the game

-When the big duping exploit happened not to long ago, hardly anyone besides the original ppl who discovered the duping method were banned, even though thousands profited off of it.

I dont care if they strip my account of everything, all my armor and weapons and money, i dont give a shit. i just want my monk back.

ive spent more late nights and been on more adventures with that lil guy.

and yes im f'ing crying about this, call me a QQer all u want.

im sry

i just want my Misera Cantra Mo/E back

Did the people who took their level 4's to the Central Transfer Chamber makes bookoos of gems and gold? I think not...

Your guilty, as you stated. Get a new account and don't exploit this time. Simple as that.

And yes, I agree about the dupers. They should witch hunt the 1,000s of other players that performed dupes and ban the crap out of their accounts. I am NOT being sarcastic here, I am dead serious. 1500 armbrace bids my hairy ass!

Slaver's "Exploit" was more like a glitch that was built into the mechanics of the game. No one really realized it was an "exploit" until they told us it was. I used it, was a great way of making money. It still required a lot of effort to do though. The fix is half ass anyways. They should have made a more elegant fix for it, and I don't mean Soul Reaping elegant.
Lord Sojar is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 10:22 AM // 10:22   #1238
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: SWAT
Profession: A/W
Default

i honest to god didn't use the the mallyx exploit more than 10 times, cuz i only got one armbrace and had legitimately farmed the previous gems.

punish me by taking all my hard earned money and armor sets, but dont take my monk away from me, jesus
turin9 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 10:23 AM // 10:23   #1239
LEET HAXXOR!
 
English Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Random Arena
Profession: N/A
Default

Why not unban the people and just have a reroll
English Warrior is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2008, 10:25 AM // 10:25   #1240
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: SWAT
Profession: A/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
Did the people who took their level 4's to the Central Transfer Chamber makes bookoos of gems and gold? I think not...
ps yes they did

ppl were selling trips to anywhere in the game for anywhere from 5k-50k

spamming it in LA, KC, Kamadan, and anywhere else they well plzed
turin9 is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update: January 23 unienaule The Riverside Inn 15 Jan 25, 2006 01:57 AM // 01:57
Update - Friday, January 13 Ogg The Riverside Inn 2 Jan 14, 2006 01:17 AM // 01:17


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM // 11:27.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("